Dental practice multiples in 2025: what practices actually sell for
Two numbers decide the price of a dental practice: the earnings a buyer can count on, and the multiple that kind of buyer pays for them. Below is the table DPC uses in its own valuation engine, and how to read it against your practice.
EBITDA multiples
EBITDA here means adjusted EBITDA: collections minus operating expenses, minus a market-rate allowance for a dentist to do the seller's clinical work, before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization. That allowance is the number most rule-of-thumb valuations forget, and it is the reason a practice that “nets 40%” on the owner's books does not sell for four times that figure.
| Purchaser | Practice size | Low | Median | High | Outlier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Individual | Single Office | 3.00× | 3.50× | 4.25× | 6.00× |
| Individual | Multi-Location | 5.00× | 8.00× | 10.00× | 11.50× |
| Individual | Large-Multi | 9.00× | 12.00× | 12.00× | 13.50× |
| Partnership | Single Office | 3.30× | 3.85× | 4.68× | 6.60× |
| Platform / PE | Single Office | 4.00× | 6.00× | 8.00× | 9.50× |
| Platform / PE | Multi-Location | 5.00× | 8.00× | 10.00× | 11.50× |
| Platform / PE | Large-Multi | 9.00× | 12.00× | 12.00× | 13.50× |
A single office bought by an individual dentist clears 3×–4.25× EBITDA, with a median of 3.5×. Partnerships pay a little more. A DSO or platform buyer pays 4×–8× for a single office — but only when there is enough scale to matter, which in practice starts around $1,200,000 of collections and $300,000 of EBITDA. Multi-location groups are a different asset class entirely and are priced accordingly.
Percentage of collections
Brokers still quote practices as a percentage of collections, because it is quick and because sellers know their collections number cold. It is a sanity check, not a method — two practices with identical collections and different overhead are not worth the same money.
| Purchaser | Practice size | Low | Median | High | Outlier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Individual | Single Office | 60% | 75% | 95% | 175% |
| Individual | Multi-Location | 80% | 100% | 130% | 220% |
| Individual | Large-Multi | 100% | 150% | 200% | 340% |
| Partnership | Single Office | 66% | 83% | 105% | 193% |
| Platform / PE | Single Office | 60% | 75% | 90% | 320% |
| Platform / PE | Multi-Location | 80% | 100% | 130% | 220% |
| Platform / PE | Large-Multi | 100% | 150% | 200% | 340% |
For a single office the collections method lands at 60%–95% of collections, median 75%. The two tables agree for a typical practice: at 62% overhead and a 17% associate allowance, EBITDA is about 21% of collections, and 21% × 3.5× ≈ 74% of collections. When your practice is far from those assumptions, trust the EBITDA table and ignore the percentage.
Worked example
A single office collecting $1,400,000 with 62% overhead has roughly $294,000 of adjusted EBITDA. At the individual-buyer table that is $882,000 to $1,249,500, with a midpoint around $1,029,000. The collections check gives $840,000 to $1,330,000 — the same neighbourhood, which is how you know the inputs are sane.
Now drop overhead five points. EBITDA rises to about $364,000 and the midpoint moves to $1,274,000 — roughly $245,000 of price for five points of overhead. That is the whole argument for cleaning up the practice before listing it.
Specialty adjustments
The table above does not split by specialty. Two things differ when a buyer prices a specialty office: the overhead it typically runs, and the multiple. The free estimate uses the defaults below — overhead only when you do not enter your own, and a small factor on every multiple. Published specialty premiums of 20–40% come almost entirely from DSO and private-equity transactions, so for an individual buyer of one office we apply roughly half of them. Every figure is sourced.
| Specialty | Default overhead | Multiple factor | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| General dentistry | 62% | baseline | Overhead 60–65% (ADA Health Policy Institute; Dental Economics, 2024–2026). Baseline multiple: the DPC transaction table itself. |
| Orthodontics | 53% | +10% | Overhead 50–55% (Dental Economics); 49% 'healthy' target (Levin Group). Premium: 2024 orthodontic transactions closed at 6.75×–11.25× EBITDA and up to 375% of collections (FOCUS Investment Banking), against 3.0×–4.25× for a general single office — a DSO-weighted premium we take at roughly half (+10%) for an individual buyer. |
| Periodontics | 56% | +5% | Overhead: 51% 'healthy' target (Levin Group), mid-50s typical for surgical specialties (Dental Economics). Premium: periodontics is listed among the specialties that clear 20–40% premiums in group transactions (Deal Prospectors, 2026); halved for an individual buyer and rounded down for a thinner buyer pool. |
| Oral surgery | 55% | +10% | Overhead 55–60% (Dental Economics, endodontics and oral surgery); 50% 'healthy' target (Levin Group). Premium: private doctor-to-doctor oral surgery sales close at 6.5×–9.0× SDE and DSO/PE buyers at 7×–12× adjusted EBITDA (Dental Transitions, Aug 2026) — again a DSO-weighted premium taken at roughly half. |
| Prosthodontics | 64% | −5% | Overhead 55–65%, lab fees 8–10% of production (Dental Economics); 64% 'healthy' target (Levin Group). No published premium: prosthodontics is absent from the specialty-premium lists that name orthodontics, oral surgery, endodontics, periodontics and pediatrics, and owner-production concentration compresses multiples by 1–2 turns (Dental Transitions) — hence a 5% discount. |
What moves you inside the range
The low and high columns are not random. A buyer moves up or down the range on how confident they are in the earnings and how transferable they are:
- Books a lender can tie out. Three reconciled years, add-backs documented. Anything unverifiable gets discounted, not argued about.
- Production that is not the seller. An associate or a strong hygiene department keeps revenue after the owner leaves.
- Active patients and new-patient flow. Patients seen in the last 18 months, not the total chart count.
- Lease term. Five or more years, or options. A short lease is the most common reason a deal reprices late.
- Payer mix. Fee-for-service and strong PPO schedules beat the same collections built on write-offs.
- Capacity. Open operatories and unscheduled treatment are upside a buyer can execute in year one — and will pay something for.
Run your own numbers
The DPC valuation calculator applies this exact table to your collections, overhead and size, and tells you which of the factors above is costing you money. It takes about a minute and does not need an account.
DPC valuation dataset (2020–2025 dental transactions), 2025 rows. Multiples describe completed transactions and are informational only — they are not an appraisal, an offer, or advice on a specific practice.